Glottolog path
Published, attributed vertical grouping. It stays independently inspectable and replaceable by another published classification.
Reconstructed + recorded history / identity
A family tree is not
the whole history.
Six exact language records share one concept. Glottolog supplies the vertical classification; WOLD supplies form-local borrowing evidence. Onto2D refuses to turn one into the other.
01 / Result at a glance
One concept. Two families. More than a tree.
The cohort is deliberately narrow: every card below is one WOLD form for LWT 1-87, joined to Glottolog by an exact Glottocode.
02 / Published classification
Vertical history remains attributed
These are selected Glottolog 5.3 paths. They are versioned classification claims, not a new Onto2D phylogeny and not unquestionable ground truth.
04 / Same concept, different histories
“The match” has six recorded forms
Borrowed score is WOLD's expert annotation. “No evidence for borrowing” is not promoted to proof of inheritance.
05 / Evidence inspector
Read the two confidence fields separately
06 / History equivalence
“Same” depends on the regime
07 / Historical Load
No honest load number here
—NOT EVALUATED
null, not zero08 / Reading discipline
Four layers, four meanings
WOLD form
One expert-curated form and borrowed-status annotation for one selected meaning.
Source relation
One donor-to-target-form record. It does not characterize the whole language and cannot become genealogy.
Display signal
A Unicode edit comparison only. It creates zero cognacy assertions and zero parent edges.