Skip to content
Onto2DLegal Precedent History Lab
Legal PrecedentVerifying artifact

Recorded history / future context

A citation is a record.
Authority is another claim.

Seven selected Supreme Court opinions make one narrow question inspectable: which recorded opinions were available when Green was decided, and what does its own text say about them?

Cohort
7 selected opinions / one court
Case identity
loading
Source identity
loading
Retrieved
loading
RESEARCH VIEW / NOT LEGAL ADVICE

This deliberately incomplete historical cohort does not determine current law, binding authority, or any legal outcome.

01 / Exact bounded result

The Green time slice has four selected prior opinions

All seven opinions remain in the source record. The 1968 view admits four earlier records, keeps Green as the target decision, and excludes two later opinions from its historical inputs.

02 / Official chronology

Earlier, target, later

GovInfo United States Reports decision dates define the time slice. Click an opinion to inspect both providers and its exact source links.

03 / Citation graph

Recorded arrows point from citing to cited opinion

The gray layer is CourtListener's native `opinion.cites` relation. Orange dashed overlays are the four separately attributed ways Green treats those citations.

CITES / recordedTREATMENT / attributedLATER / excluded at Green date
Citation network for the selected school-desegregation opinionsArrowheads point from each citing opinion to the cited opinion. The default view includes only the records available at the official Green decision date.

04 / Evidence inspector

One opinion, two provider records

Provider citation totals are displayed for orientation only. They do not participate in the time slice, treatment layer, or authority status.

05 / Citation versus normative status

Four citations; zero inferred binding claims

Every row starts with a native citation. A treatment label appears only because it is attributed to a precise locator in the official Green opinion. Binding status remains unknown in this model.

Earlier opinionCITESAttributed treatmentBinding statusProvider count

06 / Derived graph ablation

Withhold Brown II without rewriting history

Turn the ablation on to remove one node and its incident edges from the derived 1968 view. This tests graph reachability only; it supplies no legal conclusion.

DERIVED NODES5source remains 7
DERIVED EDGES10source remains 16
SOURCE MUTATEDNOalways false

07 / Source disagreement

Conflicting dates stay visible

Two records disagree across providers. The model preserves both and declares why GovInfo is used for the temporal projection; it does not guess what CourtListener meant.

08 / Historical Load

Undefined is the correct result here

—NOT EVALUATEDnull, not zero

09 / Reading discipline

What this release can and cannot establish

RECORDED

Citation

Sixteen CourtListener-native links say that one selected opinion cites another.

ATTRIBUTED

Treatment

Four labels summarize how Green discusses earlier opinions at exact official locators.

UNKNOWN

Binding status

No hierarchy rule or citation count is converted into binding authority.

INCOMPLETE

Cohort

Seven opinions form a research selection, not a complete doctrine or current-law statement.

ANALYSIS ONLY

Counterfactual

Withholding a node changes graph connectivity, never the recorded source history.